|
INDICE
|
|
There were one or two missing fragments which had not been found
during the excavation and these areas needed to be in-filled with
acrylic modeling paste; after which they were touched up with
gouache (an opaque water color) to aide the area's blending with
the surrounding metal (photograph 10,11).
|
|
|
Photograph 8
|
We made special note of the nice finishing of the top arch and
side edges of the tongue (photograph 8). The chisel cut marks
around the edges had been nicely finished using a stone file; so
that they were very smooth. This was a wonderful craftsmanlike
touch we thought, especial1y since, when finished it would never be
seen again until worked on by myself; but a further practical
reason for the smooth edge finish became evident later. The need
for a substrate support for the fragmented tongue is explained by
the fact that the metal for the tongue, was a copper, silver, gold
alloy, e.g.: 75% copper, plus 12% each of gold and silver, and was
very thin and embrittled due to its long association with large
amounts of cinnabar (mercurous sulfide) on the floor of the burial
plus other salts in the burial situation. We were unable to take
accurate measurements of the, thickness of the tongue due to the
minor encrustation of corrosion products, however, we believe that
it was slightly thicker than the gold of the face.It was deemed
there was no other safe way to handle the tongue but to give it the
almost invisible support mentioned. After the metal was installed
on the substrate and the in-fills touched up, the underside (the
heavy board itself) was also colored to minimize its presence
(photograph 9, 11). At this point in the reassembly of the entire
piece it was thought that the tongue must attach to the backplate
and be, in effect, independent of the head ... the real puzzle here
was that there were no holes in the tongue metal, and when finished
the tongue did not fit correctly for attachment to the backplate.
When flat against the backplate it barely protruded from the mouth
and at a strange angle. Further, there were no holes for attachment
on the back plate, and because of the angle the tongue had been
bent, it did not sit flat in the lower jaw. We are totally certain
the bend in the tongue was incident to manufacture and not the
haphazard result of the tons of earth on top of it.
|
|
|
Photograph 9
|
|
|
|
Photograph 10
|
Finally, when everything else had been tried and rejected we
simply sat the tongue on the agape lower jaw and ...it showed us
where it went. Unnoticed as a part of the built in anatomy in the
goldwork, there was a neat U-shaped trench in the soft palate of
the interior lower jaw which when we sat it there the tongue fit
into perfectly (photographs 7, 11). That problem solved, it
remained to discover how it was attached to the whole
originally.
With continued study of the head back and front, it was noticed
that the upright part of the tongue, when placed in the location we
had found in the lower jaw, the upright part fit neatly in the
space between the back of the eye sockets (photograph 11). It
occurred, that one of the conventions so often applied in
pre-columbian metalwork is articulation, and what a meaningful
place to apply it. this also solved the question of what the tour
holes were for in the bottom of the eye sockets. The two
horizontals (photograph 5) would be for placing string through to
attach the amber/turquoise eyes with a finial knot of string in the
center of the turquoise. The two verticals were there to make sort
of a cat's cradle into which the upright part of the tongue would
'snuggle intertwined and be held securely but allow the tongue to
wiggle in a lifelike manner (photographs 11, 12). Here also could
be the reason for the fine edge finishing. The well-finished edges
would not fray and cut the string.
|Eureka!
|
|
|
Photograph 11
|
It remained only to try this and see if their humor and
inventiveness would come through one more time. When it was all in
place, the tongue fit as neatly as it no doubt had 1,000 plus years
ago. More than that, when attached it wiggled, lifelike, at the
slightest movement.
The entire head was finished, the Cone shaped fangs and the
tongue giving the piece an eerie lifelike quality. The last part to
be attached was the half circular topknot; fascinating for its
eleven tiny articulated bosses and the very tiny holes on the
outside edge which were used to lash something to the edge of the
piece (photograph 13). Though we'll never know for sure, a good
guess would be tiny feathers this would have given a jaunty furry
look to the edge. lnstalled on the top back of the head, we could
now see the finished piece cleaned and reunited. Completed, the bat
head could now go to its place above the ceremonial mask on the
headdress.
One mystery remained to be solved and that was how this one-off
piece was fashioned. At this juncture, we were sure that this piece
was indeed a bat... several items in its anatomy gave no doubt. The
eyes when put to right were not the eyes of a peccary which spends
it days poking its snout into places where large wide open eyes
would be a disadvantage. Peccary do not usually run around with
their mouths agape and their tongues hanging out. And they don't
have fangs;
|However, the common vampire bat does.
|Desmodus rotundus weighs in at about 40 grams or little over
an ounce (photograph 14, 15). These bats are quite tiny, and range
throughout the Americas feeding on sleeping warm blooded mammals.
They are nocturnal, so large eyes are an advantage at night as well
as the large fangs for making the feeding wound. It is interesting
that these bats have relatively long wings, which enable them to
fly long distances rapidly but consume only small amounts of energy
doing so. (It has occurred that the back plate mar be the artists
rendition of these wings.)
These bats are members of the Leaf nosed bat family
|Phyllostomidae and their heat detecting system is located on
the nose leaf (photograph 7); this allows them to locate an area on
the sleeping victim where the blood flows closest to the skin. The
razor sharp fangs (which are conical, and have no enamel) then make
a quick cut ...it is at this point that the tongue comes out and
begins to lap up the blood and an enzyme in the saliva keeps the
blood from clotting.
The goldsmith must have used a dead bat to fashion his six times
larger tribute in gold; We can only surmise what condition the
little corpse must have been in when the goldsmith received it.
Perhaps condition played a part in the why's of artistic license
here. Dead things are often quite different from live things!
|
|
|
Photograph 12
|
|